All Cases

7 Court Cases
Court Case
Jun 09, 2017
graphic with red background and black text. Rudenberg v. Delaware DOJ.
  • Privacy & Technology|
  • +2 Issues

Rudenberg v. Delaware DOJ

In late 2015, we learned through our client Jonathan Rudenberg's Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that the Delaware State Police had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to purchase devices that spy on cell phones. DSP didn't want to tell us about that technology. So we sued.
Court Case
Aug 28, 2015
Cases
  • Privacy & Technology

The Fourth Amendment in the Digital Age

The ACLU of Delaware recently filed addressing the application of the Fourth Amendment in the context of computer searches.
Court Case
Jul 07, 2015
Cases
  • Privacy & Technology

ACLU Challenges Dewey Rental Property Ordinance

The ACLU of Delaware has challenged a Dewey Beach ordinance that violates rental property owners' and residents' Fourth Amendment rights.
Court Case
Jan 28, 2014
Cases
  • Privacy & Technology|
  • +2 Issues

ACLU-DE Objects to AG's Subpoena of Facebook Page

On January 27, 2014, the ACLU of Delaware filed papers with Superior Court to object to the compelling of Facebook to provide the identity of the owner of the Facebook page: Peaceful Rioters for Wilmington, Delaware.
Court Case
Apr 10, 2013
ACLU-Camera-Photos-124.jpg
  • Free Speech|
  • +9 Issues

Legal's 2012 Success Stories

Court Case
Dec 19, 2011
Cases
  • Immigration|
  • +8 Issues

Legal Report: Lookback at 2011

The American Civil Liberties Union of Delaware works in the courts, in the state and federal legislatures, with government officials and at the grassroots level to protect and promote freedom of speech, religious freedom, racial justice, LGBT rights, women’s rights, immigrants’ rights, and more.
Court Case
Nov 01, 2010
Cases
  • Privacy & Technology

Newark Agrees to Respect Fourth Amendment

In September 2010, the City of Newark gave notice that it intended to amend its housing code. However, the Newark City Council rejected the changes to the city code that would have deprived city residents of important privacy protection after ACLU-DE objected to the proposed amendment.