Media Contact

Morgan Kelly
Communications Director
[email protected]

Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Panel Reviews a Third Circuit Case Involving the Use of Solitary Confinement at CLE Event

WILMINGTON — Angelo Clark, who lived with mental disabilities, was placed in solitary confinement by Department of Correction (DOC) officials for seven months while he was housed in a Delaware prison. This violation of his Constitutional rights caused severe and irreversible harm to Clark, who passed away earlier this year — before he was able to finish his fight for justice. A panel event hosted by the ACLU of Delaware (ACLU-DE), reviewed this case, and the use of solitary confinement in Delaware, during a webinar last night.

Dwayne Bensing, staff attorney at ACLU-DE, Chad Stover, Partner at Barnes & Thornburg and trial attorney on Mr. Clark’s case, and Jennifer Ying, ACLU-DE board treasurer and partner at Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, teamed up to discuss the cruel and unusual nature of solitary confinement, the use of qualified immunity by prison officials, and trial details in the Third Circuit arguments in Clark v. Coupe.

Stover talked about the need for more treatment for incarcerated people with mental illness. “The science tells you that even short stays in solitary confinement can have serious, lasting effects on someone with mental illness, and when you place people with mental illnesses in solitary confinement, the recidivism rates get worse. What it really comes down to is that as a society, and as a prison system, we need to do more to treat mental illness rather than locking people up.”

This event was sponsored by ACLU-DE’s Amicus Society, a membership-based group that brings together attorneys focused on protecting and expanding civil liberties in Delaware. CLE credit was offered to attorneys in attendance (free to Amicus Society members).

Attorneys who joined this event were given important background on this issue, knowledge to bring into their own work on solitary confinement cases, and encouraged to use their power to fight against cruel and unusual punishment that their own clients may face in Delaware prisons.


Related Content

Court Case
Feb 02, 2022
graphic with white background and dark blue text. Angelo Clark v. Coupe et al.
  • Justice Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Angelo Clark v. Coupe et al

Cruel and unusual punishment is blatantly unconstitutional – especially when combining prolonged solitary confinement with a mental illness. We're fighting this third-circuit case to bring justice for the late Angelo Clark, and to bring an end to this cruel practice.
News & Commentary
Mar 30, 2022
Dwayne J. Bensing, Staff Attorney, stands in the Maris Courtroom of the US District Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • Justice Reform|
  • +1 Issue

Dwayne Bensing, Staff Attorney, Argues Clark Case in U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

The late Angelo Clark, who lived with serious mental health issues, was placed in solitary confinement by DOC officials for seven months while he was housed in a Delaware prison. We're fighting to make sure no Delawarean has to go through that experience again.
Court Case
Aug 06, 2015
Cases
  • Justice Reform|
  • +2 Issues

Standing Up for Inmates with Mental Health Issues in Solitary Confinement

At the James T. Vaughn Correctional Center in Smyrna, people with mental illnesses have been warehoused in solitary confinement for years on end, living in 8’x11’ cells for 23 to 24 hours a day.
Press Release
Feb 20, 2017
Solitary-Confinement.jpg

Solitary Confinement Ended as We Know It in Delaware